Ban for refs with who get things wrong!!! [Archive]

View Full Version : Ban for refs with who get things wrong!!!

tomo1811

14-09-2003, 19:31

players who do wrong like stamp or late challenges on players are banned, so why shouldnt the same apply to refs. i watched the higlights of wolves v s'ton and uriah rennie gave s'ton a penalty for absoulute nothing it wasnt helped by the fact phillips dived but, phillips having no-one around him in 5 mile radius kinda gave it away, then arsenal get a peno for nothing when pires kicked the pompey geezers leg to get a peno its a disgrace, then 3 penalties at goodison the 1 for newcastles second was not a peno it was harsh, it funny to see tht no peno tht are in doubt are given against man utd or arsenal thts 1 to ponder but basically what it boils down to is tht refs are there to inforce the rules when they dont understand the rules them selves usually in any other job theyd be sacked but a ban is gonna be hard enough

Paul B

14-09-2003, 19:37

I agree, referees should get some sort of punishment for their poor decisions as is so often the case. I mean, the refereeing in this country is quite frankly awful!

tomo1811

14-09-2003, 19:58

it drives me insane they managers are sacked for gettin things wrong i cant see why we cant sack them or give them a period of referein the conferance so they arent on the big stage

Mez

15-09-2003, 18:01

I have to agree, i'm a season ticket holder at Ibrox, and every so often, you see some rediculous decisions made by refs, and they should be banned, though, the fact they're relegated divisions to referee poorer games, is a decent enough punishment.

Paul B

15-09-2003, 18:15

I went to see Ipswich play Sheff Utd last season. (a game which we won 3-2! :) ) The ref in that match was one of the worst if not the worst ref I've ever seen. The fact that we won the game didn't affect my view, a disgraceful performance by the ref! :mad: Funnily enough though, the match was town's best performances of the season, what we us only having 10 men for most of the game. Counago was sent off in somewhat dubious fashion...Michael Brown play-acting! :mad:

tomo1811

15-09-2003, 19:10

when wolves played i think stoke, jef winter held his head against paul ince the south bank was in up roar we thought he head butted him, thts what annoys me abt refs aswell 1 rule for them another for the players

-henry-

27-11-2003, 01:46

what happened to the ref who let maradonna's 'hand of god' count as a goal?

Definitely Maybe

27-11-2003, 02:09

tomo1811

27-11-2003, 03:30

i bloody can complain its the lack of common sense and stonewall bad decisions that pisses me off

Definitely Maybe

27-11-2003, 03:40

Sorry, but untill you pass your ref's course and manage to ref thousands upon thousands of games without a hint of a problem, you cannot complain.

It is hard being a ref, especially with all the cameras within the game. They pick up every incident.

By the way, I am a ref :P.

Just my two cents~~

Erm... yes, I can complain. Poor refereeing decisions cost teams games, points, and ultimately, money. I do accept that mistakes will hapen, but the likes of Poll, Winter, and Barber have proved that they are not up to scratch. Sack them, simple as.

If a person worked in say.... a shop, and made constant mistakes, customers would complain, and that worker would get the sack. The paying customer still have the right to complain, even if they havent worked in a shop in there life, havent served 1000s off customers, and experienced how hard the job is.

Same applies for all jobs.

And just for the record, I wouldnt actually mind being a (part time) ref, I just wouldnt know where to start.

MatPhillips

27-11-2003, 23:16

the problem with that theory is, what would we do when all the refs were banned???? every game has at least one wrong decision!
or are we just talking reds/peno's/disallowed goals here??

f3n1xtx

29-11-2003, 03:48

yeah, ref is human and human does make mistake.

__S_i__

29-11-2003, 21:53

tomo1811

30-11-2003, 00:38

i went to todays match wolves v newcastle, for people who saw it nathan blake was pulled over for a clear penalty what happens no peno, and once again a shit decision to damage wolves hopes of a win. I am now 100% convinced that if refs get it wrong and are found guilty by a referees panel should be banned. My mate made a good point, why not have foreign refs? it would be different and refs wouldnt know many players repuatation there for equall opotunity, the only problem for this is the different styles of football however this dosent really effect the champions league

MatPhillips

01-12-2003, 22:04

A simple way to solve the problem of bad ref decisions is to introduce the fourth official for big decisions. I don't know why they don't use it. Even if it could only be used in 'big' games it would help, and it really wouldn't interrupt the game that much.

that was the arguement i thought had the most weight, i made that suggestion a while back, it seams like such an obvious way to solve disputes, but obviously not to the f.a, or Fifa for that matter

nath_scfc

02-12-2003, 00:23

i went to todays match wolves v newcastle, for people who saw it nathan blake was pulled over for a clear penalty what happens no peno, and once again a shit decision to damage wolves hopes of a win. I am now 100% convinced that if refs get it wrong and are found guilty by a referees panel should be banned.
I agree Blakes was a penalty but so was Jody Craddocks when he knocked it out with his arm so would you want to ban the ref for not giving the other team a pen? I think not!
By the way when we played Sheff Utd a few weeks ago the ref was a complete JOKE, i think he was Barry Knight. And Jeff Winter sent our manager off for replying to Millwalls old manager mark mcghee :confused:

tomo1811

02-12-2003, 03:11

tht craddock incodent happend right infront of me and it was stone wall peno, what im saying is that refs should have a strike system if they give 3 decisions that are blatantly wrong and then judged to be wrong by a refs pannel then a ban should take place

Spike

02-12-2003, 04:52

TV reviewing of major incidents which are disputed, like in American Football. Sure, it takes a few minutes, but so does the current idea of the ref decided, then gets surrounded by the entire opposing team for 5 minutes. Also, refs should explain their decisions, and develop a sense of humour and a grasp of common sense.

nath_scfc

04-12-2003, 22:55

I think there are 3 things what could improve the game:-
1. TV's like in rugby to decide major incidents
2. A linesman both sides of each half
3. A supension system for ref's (if they are inconsistant, dont use TV's or generally make poor decisions)
Somethings got to be done to help the refs and make there jobs easier

tomo1811

05-12-2003, 01:20

um bang on there m8, i think instead of a 2nd linesman on 1 side , a camera that runs the line on the side and then can be refered to by the ref!!! sky have the technology lets use it to help the game

earlybird

05-12-2003, 02:09

Ref's do get "relegated" after bad decisions but only on the most blatantly obvious ones. Dermot Gallagher got sent to Division 1 (yeah, thanks FA boys!! Like we want him now he's sh*t!) after he failed to send someone off for a professional foul a while back.
Only problem is with stopping the game for TV replays, what happens if the other team's on the break?
For example, Michael Brown appears to be hacked in the box but Sunderland bring it away, and Stewart scores at the other end? If you stop the game you stop the goal at the other end - so what happens if they find it wasn't a penalty?
Sunderland have then been robbed of a goal. So it's swings and roundabouts with that.
The fourth official should be allowed to view the dodgy decisions (mainly offsides and ball crossing the line) on a monitor while the game goes on so the game doesn't get stopped unnecessarily.
What do you think?

tomo1811

05-12-2003, 04:14

its makes scense for YEARS weve been asking for it why not give football fans a fair game, we wanna see the right decision, not decison tht wreck our weekends