View Full Version : FRIENDLY: Colt Python Vs Muad'dib
Colt Python
02-12-2005, 19:25
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/8846/team17gh.png
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/9454/4426vd.jpg
Itachi-san
02-12-2005, 19:39
Colt for me.
Solid midfield. Ballack, Schweinsteiger, and Recoba are extremely offensive midfielders; but Cocu and Frings will compensate for their mistakes of not dropping back. Larsson, the manificent no.7 is perfect for the "lone striker" role.
Muad's team is excellent as always, but I think your defense is a bit weak when compared to Colt's attacking force.
Good game. :)
Preki-USA
02-12-2005, 20:09
A bit weak...? :mellow:
did he stutter?
i agree with alot of the points itachi made but i think muads team would win, cisse and adriano would be a tough combo to stop...a very close match tho
Muad take my vote.....excellent midfield and attack.....nice formation Tareq.....
Colt your formation is great too dude......
martin_cranie
02-12-2005, 20:56
This is a toughy, but i'm going Muad.
This is literally the most even match i've seen, that i can remember that is.
I think that Muad's defence is better, although Lahm is better than Kobiashvilli. So a + for him there. Both central midfields are outstanding, and whilst Muad is out-numbered there, i think that he should still be able to make some good moves from Deco and Van Bommel. Up front i prefer Muad, but again it's by a hairs breadth.
Colt:
- I think your biggest problem is a lack of defensive cover. You can use some midfielders as cover, but then that takes away options for your midfield. That could damage you over the season i think.
- Larsson is incredible, but maybe some more power and speed could be needed against a young and powerful centre back combo like Kompany-Andrade. Of course you could easily argue that his experience is just as useful, so i'll leave it up to you.
Muad:
- I'd be tempted to bring Moutinho in to the midfield, or maybe to play just behind Adriano? I'm not totally sure, but he's a great prospect and i think he can be of great use.
- Also don't be afraid to use Babel. He can rival Cisse i think.
I think i'll start Babel ahead of Luque in the future. I'm glad someone else other than Figuerinha, who gets to watch him do wonders in the portuguese pitches every week, shows apreciation for Mouthinho. I'll assume no one thinks Gallas is of great use as a right back...
Iv'e gotta go with maud i really like ur team dude good job;)
And yes gallas is a good choice at RB!
Colt Python
04-12-2005, 15:47
This is a toughy, but i'm going Muad.
This is literally the most even match i've seen, that i can remember that is.
I think that Muad's defence is better, although Lahm is better than Kobiashvilli. So a + for him there. Both central midfields are outstanding, and whilst Muad is out-numbered there, i think that he should still be able to make some good moves from Deco and Van Bommel. Up front i prefer Muad, but again it's by a hairs breadth.
Colt:
- I think your biggest problem is a lack of defensive cover. You can use some midfielders as cover, but then that takes away options for your midfield. That could damage you over the season i think.
- Larsson is incredible, but maybe some more power and speed could be needed against a young and powerful centre back combo like Kompany-Andrade. Of course you could easily argue that his experience is just as useful, so i'll leave it up to you.
Muad:
- I'd be tempted to bring Moutinho in to the midfield, or maybe to play just behind Adriano? I'm not totally sure, but he's a great prospect and i think he can be of great use.
- Also don't be afraid to use Babel. He can rival Cisse i think.What do you perceive as defensive cover? I perceive it to be Frings and Cocu. If anyone has no cover in this match it's Muad.
martin_cranie
04-12-2005, 18:02
As i already stated, it's fine to use Frings and Cocu in defence, but in doing so you remove options from your midfield. That's a fact i'm afraid. It's not the end of the world, it can be easily fixed, and it doesn't mean you have a bad team, but it is a weakness. Simple as that.
Colt Python
04-12-2005, 18:23
Why would they be removed from the midfield? I'm not going to be defending for 90mins and players like Cocu can easily go box to box. Just because they are there in a DM position doesn't mean they will be standing beside Stam and Ismael all day. You need to look at what both teams can do with and without the ball then judge.
martin_cranie
04-12-2005, 20:00
Well i respect you're decision mate, but i stand by my comments.
You'll do well i'm sure but i just think there are some simple additions you can make that'll give you more depth and versatility.
If anyone has no cover in this match it's Muad.
Just because they are there in a DM position doesn't mean they will be standing beside Stam and Ismael all day.
Same goes for Bommel and Deco. Those two can defend as well as attack. Its not like they are both going to be sitting in the middle of the pitch waiting for the ball to come to them. And Adriano and Cisse will do the same up front. They are both big, strong fellas that will cause plenty of trouble to your midfielders and defenders alike. Whereas i dont think Larsson will have many chances with Kompany and Andrade on his case.
And thus the goblin severed the warrior's head...But alas, it was no mere goblin as the people had been led to believe, but a mighty Uruk-Hai who made short work of the celt and then proceded to feast on his fallen opponent's insides. WHHHHAAAARRRRRGGG!
Colt Python
06-12-2005, 21:54
Lol :laugh:
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.