Ali
It is happening again
For me they seem a bit off. For example, how can a player with attributes mainly in the mid 70s, with a few 80s etc have a rating of under 70? Correct me if I'm wrong, but Tim Cahill is rated about 68 but his attributes are decent.
I noticed this with the last game, that in ML, developing players will have a lower rating than the already developed ones despite having better attributes. If that doesn't make sense, let me put it this way:
Hamsik's default rating was about 84 or something, with attributes mainly in the low 80s high 70s (I think). Wijnaldum after 5 ML seasons was rated 87 with attributes mainly in the mid-high 80s with quite a few 90s. It can't be an average, especially when the overall rating is higher than ANY of their attributes.
I noticed this with the last game, that in ML, developing players will have a lower rating than the already developed ones despite having better attributes. If that doesn't make sense, let me put it this way:
Hamsik's default rating was about 84 or something, with attributes mainly in the low 80s high 70s (I think). Wijnaldum after 5 ML seasons was rated 87 with attributes mainly in the mid-high 80s with quite a few 90s. It can't be an average, especially when the overall rating is higher than ANY of their attributes.