For the best lawn care in cedar park, please visit our sponsor at lawn service cedar park They are a local lawn care and landscaping company that provide services in such as lawn care, lawn mowing, weeding, and landscape maintenance in Cedar Park, Austin, Round Rock, and Leander area. They are located at:

Lawn Care Service of Cedar Park 100 E Whitestone Blvd Ste 148, #166 Cedar Park, TX 78613 (512) 595-0884

Which transfer is best

Which was the better move ?

  • Chelsea signing Ballack

    Votes: 27 32.9%
  • Arsenal signing Rosicky

    Votes: 51 62.2%
  • Both moves were a waste of money

    Votes: 4 4.9%

  • Total voters
    82

Huw

PESInsight Legend
Both clubs have signed great players but which do you think is the better move by the clubs ? Arsenal look like theyve done it again as Rosicky is cerainly a class act and is only 25. I personally think this move is better because I just think Chelsea are simply buying the best players out there and not thinking about what theyve already got. Ballack is definitely a great player, slightly older at 29, but how will he play along side Lampard ?

To me this is Arsenal improving whereas Chelsea would just be buying more of what theyve already got. Saying that I think Ballack is twice the player Lampard is but Jose has already said that Lampard is his first choice midfielder so how can they both play together ?




Totally unrelated - does everyone check their pm's ?
 

Nedy

Registered User
Arsenal signing Rosicky. Is a great transfer for Arsenal, especially because Rosicky is an amazing midfielder.
Ballack is a great one too, but Chelsea dont need him really. They have Lampard, Essien, Maniche and Makelele in their amazing midfield...so I really dont know why they bought him.
 

Dragonfly

Waiting....
Rod-sicky (obviously).

I don't really rate Ballack that much, well, definitely not more than Rod-sicky.
 

Charlie

Registered User
For sheer talent and brilliance, Ballack. Im not saying that Rosicky isnt any good, because he is, but the only thing he has over Ballack, is his age. I think its quite obvious that Ballack is a much better player & all rounder. The 7m for Rosicky on top of his wages is a great deal, well done Wenger, but getting Ballack for free, 130k per week was also a good deal as Ballack is possibly the best, if not 2nd best complete midfielder in the world.

Ballack is the better buy for me.
 

50!

115 and Counting...
I could only make a judgement once I've seen both of them play at least 10 games if not the whole season.
 

Jonny2J

Registered User
dragonfly said:
I don't really rate Ballack that much, well, definitely not more than Rod-sicky.
:shocking:

He's absolutely sensational, he's a more complete player than Frank that's for certain
 

Scarface

The World Is Yours
Arsenal need Rosicky far more than Chelsea need Ballack. The Czech has more to gain, he will want to prove he can be a star at the top level, and he should fit into our playing style perfectly, therefore Rosicky to Arsenal.
 

cadey

Registered User
Ballack is one of the best midfielders in the world. Chelsea only need two world class strikers to compliment the midfield and then they will have the best team in Europe.

Best players in the world, in my opinion.

1. Ronaldinho
2. Thierry Henry
3. Wayne Rooney
4. Steven Gerrard
5. Michael Ballack
 

Billy Minof

La Decima
Ballack of course.
Rosicky needs to proves his worth while Ballack is the complete MF player plus they didnt pay a penny for him.
 

Singey

Registered User
I think Rosicky is the better signing of the two. Ballack is a great player, dont get me wrong, but he is ageing a little, not that will affect his performances for Chelski, but Rosicky is a good prospect, he has already developed into a class player and he really can be a hit for the Gunners if he gets his act together in time for the new season.
 

TheAlchemist

Registered User
I think people are arguing over who is the best rather than whats the best singning.

Ballack is more experienced, hes a leader and he is more suited to the premiership, physically and technically, than Rosicky.
 

adams9802

Registered User
ddd said:
Ballack is more experienced, hes a leader and he is more suited to the premiership, physically and technically, than Rosicky.
I think that's quite impossible to say at the moment. Ballack could come and fall flat on his face here. I don't think he will but I think we should all reserve judgment till we see them line up for their respective teams.
 

Dr. Bob Kelso

Welcome back...
Arsenal signing Rosicky for me. A player before Liverpool signed Xabi I coverted more than any other. He was all over Holland in the WC and has quality and effort in spades. Ballack although having the quality doesn't have the right attitude and I believe his signing will hinder Chelski in the future.
 

Gun_Runner

100Gunz-100Clipz
cadey said:
Ballack is one of the best midfielders in the world. Chelsea only need two world class strikers to compliment the midfield and then they will have the best team in Europe.

Best players in the world, in my opinion.

1. Ronaldinho
2. Thierry Henry
3. Wayne Rooney
4. Steven Gerrard
5. Michael Ballack

Wayne is never in the top 5...not yet anyway, Eto'o and Sheva are more clinical than him, give him a couple of years though;)

tbh I think Rosicky will prove to be the wiser buy, Arsenal can strengthen their squad with him...Chelsea will strengthen their squad with Ballack-but they didnt really need him and from what Ive heard hes arrogant so he may cause upsets in the team!

BTW Im surprised Rosicky is only 25...hes been kicking about for years now!
 

wrigh2uk

Registered User
Chelsea are just doing the Real Madrid tatics buy players at the best, and look where that has got Madrid now
 
Top