|
|
#166 | ||||||||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Quote:
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#167 | |||||||
|
another Nadal vs. Federer final at Roland Garros.
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#168 | ||||||||
|
Nadal will take it again, I reckon.
He's just on too good a form at the moment. Despite winning in 3 sets, Federer didn't look overly convincing today.
__________________
"They say you never know what you have until it's gone. I wanted to know what I had - so I got rid of everything." - Steven Wright |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#169 | ||||||||
|
The last time Federer and Nadal met on clay Federer beat him and that was about a week prior to the French Open, so anything is possible.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#170 | |||||||
|
Nadal wins three straight
By Matthew Cronin Sunday, June 10, 2007 In yet another rock solid performance in a Roland Garros final, Rafael Nadal became the first man since the great Bjorn Borg to win three straight crowns when he wore out top-ranked Roger Federer 6-3, 4-6, 6-3, 6-4 in the final. “It's an incredible dream to be able to play this well in front of such a great crowd,” Nadal said. Still undefeated in Paris, the tireless, speedy Spaniard never withered under Federer's aggressive attack, daring the Swiss to go up, around and over his impenetrable defensive wall. While Federer did everything within his power to try and confuse the Spaniard, he was unable to consistently get the remarkably focused Spaniard off balance. Unable to produce enough winners Nadal set the tone early in the contest, playing deep and relentless shots, pounding into Federer's backhand and waiting patiently for his openings. While Federer weaker backhand side did not exactly break down, he was unable to produce enough winners off of it and nearly every time that the Spaniard gained control of an exchange with his heavy topspin forehand, Nadal cashed in. Moreover, even when he gained break point opportunities, Federer was unable to find the right combinations to trip up Nadal, who appeared to be revelling in the opportunity to participate in the high-risk moments. Federer ended the contest having taken only one of his 17 break-point chances. The 10-time Grand Slam champion often wowed the crowd with brilliant shot-making, but point in, point out, Nadal was much more solid. After going down in a grinding first set, Federer's high variety attack showed through in the second set, as he began to mix in low backhand slices, net rushes and rapid-fire forehands. Nadal continued to push the Swiss hard, though, forcing him to use five set points to grab the set, which Federer won on a forehand error by the Spanish No.2 seed. Nadal adeptly mixed up his serves The Swiss had to work so hard to win the second that he looked mentally tired coming out in the third set, where he was immediately broken. With a break in hand, Nadal upped his level, yanking the Swiss all over the court until he took his legs out from under him. Nadal did not serve spectacularly well, but he adeptly mixed up his serves and consequently saw enough mid-court balls to be able to seize control of the points. The muscular lefty won the set when he crushed a forehand crosscourt winner. Federer again got himself in trouble at the opening of the fourth set when pressing on his forehand side, finding it impossible to penetrate the Spaniard. He dumped a forehand into the net and was broken to 1-2, at which point Nadal never looked back, throwing huge body blows at the Swiss. In typical Nadal fashion, he held at love to win the title when Federer flew a forehand long. An incredible 21-0 mark at Roland Garros The 21-year-old Nadal then fell on his back, squirmed in delight on his beloved red clay and eventually climbed up into the players' box, high-fiving the president of the Spanish Tennis Federation, Pedro Munoz, and hugging his coach and uncle Tony, as well as his parents. Nadal now holds an incredible 21-0 mark at Roland Garros and finished the match with only 28 unforced errors to 60 from Federer. He was congratulated during trophy ceremony by three-time champion Gustavo Kuerten, who won his first crown in Paris in 1997 and vowed to return next year. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#171 | |||||||||
|
Murray's out of Wimbledon. Shame, I wanted to see what he'd be like this year to see how his stamina would do, usually he's half-dead by the 4th set.
Will it be another Federer/Nadal final? Probably ¬_¬
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Quote:
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#172 | ||||||||
|
Oh great, now we have to rely on Henman
![]() I think it will be another Federer/Roddick final. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#173 | ||||||||||
|
No chance. Nadal has the beating of most and I see them two going at it again.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#174 | ||||||||
|
I hear Henman and Rusedski are retiring after their obvious first round defeats. They are not just retiring from Tennis but life. They plan to drive Tennis rackets into their hearts on centre court with much clapping from the sad cunts watching it.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#175 | ||||||||
|
I couldn't believe that the Henman match stopped last night, it was great. But I suppose if the players couldn't see then it wasn't going to be a good match. Anyone see the guy in the Newcastle shirt?
![]() |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#176 | |||||||
|
When is Sharapova playing?
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#177 | ||||||||
|
Can't tell exactly because they just do an Order of Play but it the 3rd match on Court 1, the 1st match starts at 1pm.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#178 | ||||||||
|
All the fags cheering for tim looked like cunts especially the gash in the mag shirt. Don't they have homes to go to?
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#179 | ||||||||
|
I like watching womens tennis with the sound turned right up and then I shut my eyes and listen to the groans. The only down side is every now and then some bastard will shout FAULT or OUT and it puts me right off.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. " border="0" /> Even Richard Dawkins thinks Ian Brown is God
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#180 | ||||||||
|
shhhhh timmy
|
||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59.






















