I know this is highly off topic but I really disagree. You have to keep in kind that back in 1999-2000, the gaming industry was nowhere near as big and much fewer games came out. So the great games were way easier to find. If you look hard enough, there are superb games all around you. You just have to find them

Though I agree that most games are becoming easier.
Sabatasso. I never denied bugs. I said at least they were fixed with patches that are free. And that shows a sign of gratitude and care from the devs.
Dark Souls was amazing. Yes it had bugs but none as grave as you made it sound.
The Witcher 2 awfully balanced? Really. The game is hard and the game requires thought. It's not awfully balanced at all. I played the 360 version and it was and still is one of the best games ever made in my eyes. I never denied the bugs though because every game has them.
I agree that Kingdoms of Amalur is unfinished because it had potential for more but it';s main feature was not story telling. It's an arcade rpg so the combat is what sells it not the story and the combat was fun as hell.
And even if some car games are arcade, it doesn't mean lazy. It means that arcade car games are not for you

Remember that not everyone has a wheel to play them ad not everyone can drive in real life. So arcade can sometimes be fun aswell.
And finally Skyrim? Again It's an RPG. The main point is to role play and role playing was excellent. The endless options to take were the best I've seen in an RPG. Yes, it had bugs and annoyances, but kep in mind that this huge game is running on 512mb of memory. You couldn't expect more.
Honestly by the looks of things, it's not the game's fault, it's your unreasonable expectations and nostalgia that's making you say these things. Nothing personal.

It's just my take.
Though I agree that less games are taking story potential serious.