Or maybe you're under rating them. They did win the league undefeated after all, and are still undefeated this season. I don't like Juve either, but credit where credit's due.
I also agree that lower league players can be faster & stronger etc. For example if Usain Bolt did actually get signed up by someone obviously there would be no-one faster, but overall you'd expect him to be a lot worse than many slow players.
I have no dislike for Juventus, no opinion what so ever, i watch Serie a whenever its on and have seen a bit of them this season in the champions league and I don't think I am under rating them at all. As I said, Ziegler never played in the league for them, and was an average player at Sampdoria for 2 of his years there, an 80 is far too high, same applies to Krasic who played about 10 games last season, in comparison to other players in these positions, I think we would all agree that Arshavin is overrated so the same should be applied to players like that, players like Vidal, Buffon and Chiellini are good and have shown that on a consistent basis. I just think if you go in and pick the team based on the ratings you will see all the starters are above 80, some above 85 even though they have done little to prove this over the last season and these stats have been carried over for years.
Lucio is better than most prem defenders outside of Kompany.
Well Kompany is a quality player, although im not sure what his rating is in the game.
As for your point, I would have to disagree, if I gave you the choice of Vidic, Jagielka, Vermalen, Agger or Lucio would you really choose him, at 34? Not saying all them players are better than him, but Lucio's stats have carried over from 3 years ago to now, at Inter, under Mouriniho, he was a world class centre back, but lets not forget he was part of an inter team who finished outside the top 3 teams. Also at 90 he is equally as good as Chiellini, which is just downright confusing.