jenicek68
Registered User
Firstly I hope that i will not get baned for name of this thread.. 
Well, guys.. More i play fifa 09, better it gets and when i look back on PES 09, than i am getting more and more sure, that even if konami will make biggest posible effort ( and i really doubt that ), there is no chance of catching Fifa 09, cant imagine how good fifa 10 will be.. Though time you have to spend with fifa is basicly all the time you got for play on Xbox or PS 3.. If I read about Amateur staff and improvements to PES i am wondering if he tryed fifa, couse it is all there.. There are same bugs like weather and night in manager mode. But in general it is milion times closer to reality then PES.
I would like to talk about England League teams and how they works in Fifa 09.. I am playing on Legend level, fast speed and 10 mins halfs.. This footy is so incredible in every way possible.. 10 mins half realy gives you serious look on your strategies and you have to understand to them, otherwise you will be loosing..
Arsenal>
I used to play for Arsenal, which was really fast pace game as in real.. Arsenal and their players are really good choice for first timers.. It is very safe feeling.. Defence is working superb, almunia is good keeper in bad times.. Rosicky and Fabregas are the top players and Abedayor is fast, tall and very flexible striker which can score, take ball to line and keep it nice for himself.. I feel that Arsenal don't have a good striker same as in real.. Wenger is bit unlucky with injuries, but still i feel that he should go for some sort of experienced striker like Adriano, that is what Arsenal really needs and that is why Arsenal isn't first and will not be if they will not get someone strong there.. I am really sure that Arsenal has been made with sharp accuary.. When you play for them, match looks just like in TV..
Chelsea>
Then i desided to play for exactly rival side in every way possible.. Of course it was Chelsea.. Slow pace due to slower players or fast ones with less technique.. No matter what you try teamgame and passes aren't that smooth like gunners got.. It is very risky team, which can win or lose from one situation. I am playing for this side rather more defensively, couse if you open, you will play some adrenalin matches there. But the power of that team is exactly where it is in real.. DIDIER DROGBA can be invisible for whole match and then it is one chance and he will score or hit the bar at least.. Sometimes Ballack and Lampard making good long range effords. Essien can hold ball well and heal your back when it needs.. And weekest part i feel Chelsea got right now? It is defensive line.. Terry (one of my favorite player is not that good anymore), so it feels, that there is not real leader in deffence.. But behind them is Peter Cech, and of course he is best goalkeeper in the whole Space.. Summary? Chelsea without Cech and Drogba? Can't imagine that in real and same in the game.. So i have to say again, that Chelsea has been too very precisely..
What about your experience with teams.. Which one you prefere and why?
Well, guys.. More i play fifa 09, better it gets and when i look back on PES 09, than i am getting more and more sure, that even if konami will make biggest posible effort ( and i really doubt that ), there is no chance of catching Fifa 09, cant imagine how good fifa 10 will be.. Though time you have to spend with fifa is basicly all the time you got for play on Xbox or PS 3.. If I read about Amateur staff and improvements to PES i am wondering if he tryed fifa, couse it is all there.. There are same bugs like weather and night in manager mode. But in general it is milion times closer to reality then PES.I would like to talk about England League teams and how they works in Fifa 09.. I am playing on Legend level, fast speed and 10 mins halfs.. This footy is so incredible in every way possible.. 10 mins half realy gives you serious look on your strategies and you have to understand to them, otherwise you will be loosing..
Arsenal>
I used to play for Arsenal, which was really fast pace game as in real.. Arsenal and their players are really good choice for first timers.. It is very safe feeling.. Defence is working superb, almunia is good keeper in bad times.. Rosicky and Fabregas are the top players and Abedayor is fast, tall and very flexible striker which can score, take ball to line and keep it nice for himself.. I feel that Arsenal don't have a good striker same as in real.. Wenger is bit unlucky with injuries, but still i feel that he should go for some sort of experienced striker like Adriano, that is what Arsenal really needs and that is why Arsenal isn't first and will not be if they will not get someone strong there.. I am really sure that Arsenal has been made with sharp accuary.. When you play for them, match looks just like in TV..
Chelsea>
Then i desided to play for exactly rival side in every way possible.. Of course it was Chelsea.. Slow pace due to slower players or fast ones with less technique.. No matter what you try teamgame and passes aren't that smooth like gunners got.. It is very risky team, which can win or lose from one situation. I am playing for this side rather more defensively, couse if you open, you will play some adrenalin matches there. But the power of that team is exactly where it is in real.. DIDIER DROGBA can be invisible for whole match and then it is one chance and he will score or hit the bar at least..
Sometimes Ballack and Lampard making good long range effords. Essien can hold ball well and heal your back when it needs.. And weekest part i feel Chelsea got right now? It is defensive line.. Terry (one of my favorite player is not that good anymore), so it feels, that there is not real leader in deffence.. But behind them is Peter Cech, and of course he is best goalkeeper in the whole Space.. Summary? Chelsea without Cech and Drogba? Can't imagine that in real and same in the game.. So i have to say again, that Chelsea has been too very precisely.. What about your experience with teams.. Which one you prefere and why?
