Eduardo Dubs
Registered User
I have a question to ask, that was still left unanswered even after I sent this moderator a message.
But first, let me tell you the story.
So there was a thread in the 2010 Suggestions Section that suggested adding Brazilian teams and others into PES. After I posted a comment, someone posted right after me that they thought I had a very good point. To show my satisfaction, I posted one of those famous Obama Chin-Up pictures. Then an unhappy person comes along and decides to talk smack about something he really doesn't know much about, and take it way off-topic, when all I had done was post a pic., and compares Obama to Hitler and Saddam Hussein. Says they both ''represented far less evil regimes, its just that their PR wasn't as good.''
A mod comes and tells us to take it out of the thread (which I later did).
And with that, he decides to make another joke about it.
The moderator doesn't take any action
With that user having already been rude throughout the whole thread, even before the Obama thing, two users say that I shouldn't bother with him, calling him a ''pussycat''. With that, the moderator locks the thread.
I just want to know why the thread was locked with that, not with the comparisons of Hitler with Obama.
As far as I know, Obama never forced people to work in camps?
As far as I know, Obama never had millions dig their own graves to then have them shot.
As far as I know, Obama has never started a goddamn genocide.
I'm trying to contain some of my actual feelings, because it can get quite personal, but I just want this simple question answered.
Why is it that the thread was not locked with those accusations and the user infracted?
Understand I'm not trying to ''bitch'', so if you do think I am, you're wrong.
But first, let me tell you the story.
So there was a thread in the 2010 Suggestions Section that suggested adding Brazilian teams and others into PES. After I posted a comment, someone posted right after me that they thought I had a very good point. To show my satisfaction, I posted one of those famous Obama Chin-Up pictures. Then an unhappy person comes along and decides to talk smack about something he really doesn't know much about, and take it way off-topic, when all I had done was post a pic., and compares Obama to Hitler and Saddam Hussein. Says they both ''represented far less evil regimes, its just that their PR wasn't as good.''
A mod comes and tells us to take it out of the thread (which I later did).
And with that, he decides to make another joke about it.
The moderator doesn't take any action
With that user having already been rude throughout the whole thread, even before the Obama thing, two users say that I shouldn't bother with him, calling him a ''pussycat''. With that, the moderator locks the thread.
I just want to know why the thread was locked with that, not with the comparisons of Hitler with Obama.
As far as I know, Obama never forced people to work in camps?
As far as I know, Obama never had millions dig their own graves to then have them shot.
As far as I know, Obama has never started a goddamn genocide.
I'm trying to contain some of my actual feelings, because it can get quite personal, but I just want this simple question answered.
Why is it that the thread was not locked with those accusations and the user infracted?
Understand I'm not trying to ''bitch'', so if you do think I am, you're wrong.