proevofan88
Registered User
TBH im quite slow when it comes to news i dont really go in depth to search for it...i only know whats going on when im on this forum in real time replies so.... but thanks for link mate
Gotcha.
Np.
Lawn Care Service of Cedar Park 100 E Whitestone Blvd Ste 148, #166 Cedar Park, TX 78613 (512) 595-0884
TBH im quite slow when it comes to news i dont really go in depth to search for it...i only know whats going on when im on this forum in real time replies so.... but thanks for link mate
Man tell you what is it raining or fog at anfield because that looked amazing the way you could see the weather inside the stadium contrasting the stands instead of just in your screen setting the mood...
what your also forgeting tech skill is these guys have played the newer build and can see from the gamescom demo the massive differences in this old code.
Ermm well according to a poster on evo web, the datasheets say this videos on show are 80%, and thats what the people on other forums are saying too.
But whatever if you think they are showing 50% builds at gamescom, good for you.
Apparently the demo is the 5% build, and the players only have one leg, they had to cut loads of stuff out for legal reasons, but the full version is completley different.
Yea man just really impressed with the lighting and weather effects....at 50 or 80% complete there is still 50 or 20% room for improvement so hopfully it will be a heavy contender this year
It is not a 50% build. That's complete crap.
It is probably around 70% ( DEMOS have to be made months before actual show ).
The game itself ( back in Japan ) is about 90% now.
Nevertheless, the graphics to me are just a bonus. I am glad the gameplay lokoed smooth and it flowed to well in that video.
PES2010 will still most likely get lower scores than FIFA and that is due to the fact that: Initial response ( if you are honest ) is that FIFA is a technical marvel and its very smooth. After a few weeks the game gets stale.
The point of that?: Critics get about 1 to 2 weeks to write up review. So while PES never blows you away it certainy lasts longer. Whereas the FIFA titles usually impress in the beginning but begin to be stale.
If each site played the game for 2 months and than gave FINAL verdict of the games: I have no doubt that PES2010 would have higher scores.
It is not a 50% build. That's complete crap.
It is probably around 70% ( DEMOS have to be made months before actual show ).
The game itself ( back in Japan ) is about 90% now.
Nevertheless, the graphics to me are just a bonus. I am glad the gameplay lokoed smooth and it flowed to well in that video.
PES2010 will still most likely get lower scores than FIFA and that is due to the fact that: Initial response ( if you are honest ) is that FIFA is a technical marvel and its very smooth. After a few weeks the game gets stale.
The point of that?: Critics get about 1 to 2 weeks to write up review. So while PES never blows you away it certainy lasts longer. Whereas the FIFA titles usually impress in the beginning but begin to be stale.
If each site played the game for 2 months and than gave FINAL verdict of the games: I have no doubt that PES2010 would have higher scores.
this is getting stupid, wenb and pesfan are a bunch of retards, i swear, us people at pesgaming should get codes and make better judgements on the game.
Even jon murphy posted how we seemed to be the skeptics out of the fansites, why not give the skeptics who love pes the codes? surely they will make better changes than wenb and pesfan sucking konami's dick saying it's awesome
EDIT: Saw the video, it was quite good, the gameplay seemed smoother and slower and there were some new animations (not many but you could tell some have been added) and overall pretty decent
why does people always chose barcalona as if they can beat liverpool...... plus WTF why does he go to the xbox 360 blade...ok its on xbox we get it you cock