For the best lawn care in cedar park, please visit our sponsor at lawn service cedar park They are a local lawn care and landscaping company that provide services in such as lawn care, lawn mowing, weeding, and landscape maintenance in Cedar Park, Austin, Round Rock, and Leander area. They are located at:

Lawn Care Service of Cedar Park 100 E Whitestone Blvd Ste 148, #166 Cedar Park, TX 78613 (512) 595-0884

Normal v Dynamic

LiL MeSsI

LiL MeSsI

Registered User
Just wanted to know what most people decide to make players develop in the way of DYNAMIC which I think is if you play you improve the stats and then NORMAL is just based on the player.

So can anyone shine a light on this topic?
 
A

abu97

Registered User
Well i have played both and dynamic tend to focus on training points, peformances and their traditional growth curves. For example, last night i scored a free kick with shimizu and his fk acc. went up and curl in the next 2 weeks. Also, Modeste was averaging a goal a game in the epl so his shooting stats went up. However the downside to this is if a player plays bad - sloppy passes, losing possession, own goals and low ratings mean the player by decrease or stay the same however he can increase again.
E.g., David Jarolim, reborn and 18yrs old had a rating of 80 o start up with and due to poor peformances, he went down and i looked like i was destroying his carreer however next season he asisted lots and scored some cracking volleys so now he is 81 and 20 and i hopei can rebuild him into one of the best players.
But they can also increase if you train them manuelly and set alll players focus points
However, the other players not in your team just develop there normal growth curve and it don't depend on their peformances.
So personally I would go for dynamic because it is more of a challenge so if i score a good goal, it won't really matter as i wont increase on it and instead follows my normal growth curve

I hope I have helped you understand and i look forward to see which one you chose :)
 
S-D-P

S-D-P

Registered User
abu97 pretty much hit the nail on the head. I love dynamic but use standard as I think the players develop at a more realistic rate, dynamic develops players a bit fast for my liking.

Both are great systems though and offer a good degree of realism.
 
A

abu97

Registered User
S-D-P said:
abu97 pretty much hit the nail on the head. I love dynamic but use standard as I think the players develop at a more realistic rate, dynamic develops players a bit fast for my liking.

Both are great systems though and offer a good degree of realism.
Click to expand...

Yeah i agree that some dynamic players ratings are a bit off, but that depends if they are playing really good. If you are a very good player of the game, probably like you, then their stats might be way off, but sometimes they don't, tello has only increased by one in my first two seasons, which is appalling considering thhe fact that i got him when he was 18 or 19
 
muscularmatt

muscularmatt

Registered User
Dynamic is a great idea, but it needs tweaking a little. I've always thought up/down development was needed, not just the whole up, peak, down model.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top