For the best lawn care in cedar park, please visit our sponsor at lawn service cedar park They are a local lawn care and landscaping company that provide services in such as lawn care, lawn mowing, weeding, and landscape maintenance in Cedar Park, Austin, Round Rock, and Leander area. They are located at:

Lawn Care Service of Cedar Park 100 E Whitestone Blvd Ste 148, #166 Cedar Park, TX 78613 (512) 595-0884

Team PESGaming (PS3) (FIFA 10)

Die Hard Pes Fan

Registered User
Is this for Fifa 10?
If yes, is there a PES 2010 one?
Is it Become A Legend?
Is it 10vs10?
Can you do that on PES?
Is there one for Xbox 360?
 

Neo

First It Giveth
That's not fair Neo.

DC has played perhaps half of his games at CF, Berry started off in defence and I've played at RCM more than once, in some stupid dodgy wing positions for some games, have been at LS and now play at CF more than RS. You cannot just look at those and say who should play where. Its entirely unfair on Berry, for a start.

Those of us in attack know where we should be playing and generally how to link up with one another.

You also aren't taking into consideration at all where we're happy playing - I'd pick RS every time if I could but both that's now the favoured position of both Berry and Original?. Berry isn't good at LS, Original? doesn't like it and I'm not as comfortable there as at RS but I'll play there. Between us, plus with you on sometimes, we're fine as we are so long as we ensure we all play to the best of our VP's abilities. In the case of Berry, his lack of pace mean he needs to stay in the RS role he's comfortable in more often than not - dropping him to CF means a lack of support from that position for the two strikers as they'll be running away from him.

I sincerely believe our biggest problem is the midfield. They're overcrowding the attack.

Not fair how?

I'm never said that you should decide who plays where purely based on the stats and that they should be the be all and end all of everything. I simply suggested that the goals tally could provide a discussion topic for the four of you and that the entire stats page may help you decide different ways of linking up with one another and how best to use your strengths and weaknesses.

I'm fully aware of the flaws that come with quoting stats (they always do), and that they should never be taken at face value. So yes, it's true, I'm not an idiot.
 

Fab

Registered User
I will try to hang back more often then by the looks of things - but only when we have at least 2 strikers on, otherwise I will head forward.
 

Dale C.

Registered User
Why not create a poll based on who should be the starting choice strikers, if everyone is on at the same time ;)
 

Sweey

*RETIRED*
I will try to hang back more often then by the looks of things - but only when we have at least 2 strikers on, otherwise I will head forward.

You're pretty good going forward and when I've been at CF and dropping deep (like Andrea Pirlo deep), you've been supporting the attack while I get back up the pitch so that has worked well. I guess we're having balance issues - the other midfielders certainly need to sit and only break if you don't.

Something has changed in the last couple of weeks by the looks of it to me. Results suddenly became erratic.

Why not create a poll based on who should be the starting choice strikers, if everyone is on at the same time ;)

Because Phatmann moves to LB or we split into two teams. Berry cannot play in midfield due to the stature of his VP so a poll isn't going to help is it? :tongue:

We've always worked it out fine going into games and we'll continue to do so.

On the whole, why are we discussing who should play in attack? None of us strikers have raised a serious issue have we? :erm: The key point for Berry is to keep as far up the field as possible, the rest of us know what we have to do off that.
 

Original?

istrator
I will try to hang back more often then by the looks of things - but only when we have at least 2 strikers on, otherwise I will head forward.

I wouldn't worry about your performances, you generally play very well and keep the team ticking over. You win the ball back and support the front line well.
 

BarnDoor

Witchfinder General
A formation me, DC and - AndehPandeh was it? - were using earlier, 4-2-3-1 was working quite well.
 

Neo

First It Giveth
I'm on now if anyone wants to join me. Will have to take a break between 9 and 9:30 though.
 

Haribo

Super Moderator
My apologies it was AndyClimax.

Apology accepted!

I've stayed out of this debate, mainly because I've not witnessed very many games and I can hardly direct criticism elsewhere. I need to work a lot with my VP, it seems his best attributes are dead balls. Little pace and poor control seem to let me down.

Original? seemed very good earlier as the front man, beating the offside trap and getting through on goal with a burst of speed. I hardly think there's much of an issue up top as there's not a fixed 'best' starting 11, and it can always be split into two sets if there are large numbers online.
 

Bež

Registered User
Just logged into PSN now. Damn, looks like I'm too late. Couldn't get on any earlier, sorry. How well do you think you all played this evening?
 

Phatmann

HGW XX/7
Sorry I didn't respond last night, I was playing LittleBigPlanet and had to install an update that took over an hour, therefore couldn't access the XMB. I think one of the main reasons we are finding it tough is probably because everyone would have had ample time now to have their VP with very high stats. Since we have no VPs in defence, we are having strikers with overall stats in the 80s coming up against the generic players who are fucking useless. I've certainly found that to be the case when I've played as ANY recently anyway. Winning headers is a nightmare.
 

BarnDoor

Witchfinder General
I think Phats is right. It's not that the wheels have come off, it's just that other teams are getting better and better, especially those fags we came up against last night with the superhuman strikers.

Rule of thumb - if the opposition strike force has a black guy with white hair and gloves, you generally know you're in trouble.
 
Top