PES Tweedy
Registered User
I can play it on 800x600 in 16bit mode but the gameplay drags on medium setting an all the support options enabled, with a 512mb graphics card for christsake.
What graphics card are you using to run PES2008?
- Thread starter Noodex
- Start date
jase_the_ace
Registered User
ello guys,
I have an ATI radeon x1300 altho its not supported as its not in the list on the game case, do you think it will run ok if I tweak the settings down??
I have an ATI radeon x1300 altho its not supported as its not in the list on the game case, do you think it will run ok if I tweak the settings down??
lol
sounds like ur compensating for not having a GTx..
Face the facts GTS is the homebrand / crap version of the GTX.. GTX isnt just for HI end monitors, its for gamers who want the best performance for all the new games in the near future.
Crysis is a huge benchmark, ppl have ran it with a GTS and got bad FPS lag even on low end monitors, GTX runs it fine at all sizes and detail levels.
Its the next step in gaming and if u want to say a GTX is only for hi res monitors then dont upgrade but i will garentee you a GTS will not give u performance needed for the next-gen pc games in the near future.
The benchmarks rate GTX > GTS at huge increases its not just a price / monitor thing, you pay for what you get.
In every version of Nvidia chips the GS / GTS flags do not carry the performance of the chip version but act as a cheap version which is really using features such as Dx10 without the needed performance of the AA engines coming with it. Its a total waste of money buying the GTS / GS flags in Nvidia.
sounds like ur compensating for not having a GTx..
Face the facts GTS is the homebrand / crap version of the GTX.. GTX isnt just for HI end monitors, its for gamers who want the best performance for all the new games in the near future.
Crysis is a huge benchmark, ppl have ran it with a GTS and got bad FPS lag even on low end monitors, GTX runs it fine at all sizes and detail levels.
Its the next step in gaming and if u want to say a GTX is only for hi res monitors then dont upgrade but i will garentee you a GTS will not give u performance needed for the next-gen pc games in the near future.
The benchmarks rate GTX > GTS at huge increases its not just a price / monitor thing, you pay for what you get.
In every version of Nvidia chips the GS / GTS flags do not carry the performance of the chip version but act as a cheap version which is really using features such as Dx10 without the needed performance of the AA engines coming with it. Its a total waste of money buying the GTS / GS flags in Nvidia.
jase_the_ace
Registered User
lol erm im not too up to date with the latest graphics cards. I got this card with the pc like year and a half ago. I dont play games on my pc really, just the old pro evo's as I had a PS2 but now have a PS3.
newayz
what about if I upgrade to an radeon x1650 which is about £60-70. surely that will do the trick and allow me to play on highest detail without any problems.
newayz
what about if I upgrade to an radeon x1650 which is about £60-70. surely that will do the trick and allow me to play on highest detail without any problems.
I have a weak pentium4 3.0 GHz, 2 GB ram and a 512 MB 7600gs that I overclocked. The processor is the main thing that gets in my way. I have a 19 inch 4:3 monitor and a 58 inch 1080p DLP tv that I use over HDMI.
When I play at 1280 x 720 on medium there is choppiness at times but it doesn't really improve when I go to low. I have 'frame skipping' and 'wait for v sync' checked to give me the best results. Definitely time for a new machine...
What do you all have checked for 'frame skipping' and 'wait for v sync'? Does anyone have anything special set for this game in the NVIDIA control panel?
Jim
When I play at 1280 x 720 on medium there is choppiness at times but it doesn't really improve when I go to low. I have 'frame skipping' and 'wait for v sync' checked to give me the best results. Definitely time for a new machine...
What do you all have checked for 'frame skipping' and 'wait for v sync'? Does anyone have anything special set for this game in the NVIDIA control panel?
Jim
I don't know how technically aware you are but not amazingly by the looks of things. The GTX does perform better than the GTS at lower resolutions, but barely. Does it compensate for the extra £150 it would have cost me to get a GTX when I'm not gaming at a resolution where it would start to really pull away from a GTS? The big fat fuck off answer is no as I would also have had to replace my excellent 600W PSU due to the GTX drawing so much power and my Seasonic not having two power connectors. I made the right decision and would never get a GTX because the ninth series of nVidia cards are out in December making yours an also-ran for a much higher price.
Also one thing: don't ever talk to be about "next-gen PC games". The PC doesn't have set generations like shit consoles do as it progresses much faster and isn't burdened by one massive release every 3-6 years.
In the link below you'll see that the 8800GT looks rather good considering the price and the benchmarks show that at low resolutions the advantages of a GTX are rather minimal. Remember: I've stated at anything over 1680x1050 it pulls away because it does. I have no problem with you owning a GTX but that you come on here telling everyone they're shit for not having one is utterly mindless. I'm not into wasting money. I could've bought a GTX but decided not to spend the additional £200 or so (GPU and PSU) for improvements I wouldn't even notice. My 8800GTS is yet to struggle in a single game I've played at any resolution all with maximum detail.
http://uk.gamespot.com/features/6181908/index.html?tag=topslot;title;3&om_act=convert&om_clk=topslot
j-we
Registered User
you have a 24" HD and you run it at 1650x1050, wtf is that, at least have it at 1920x1200. and btw that isnt the best.
i got x1650 512mb and plays choppy.
lol
LOL,
get ur self crysis boom..... why is my GTS FPS lagg.... its happend over and over go check the Forums for crysis. And PSU problems mate, Im runnin 250W max of my 1000W psu. It dosent eat huge amounts its just a precaution to have huge PSU on GTX systems.
And its not an amazing difference yet because there as i said it will be the near future that GTX will blow GTS away in every aspect.
By the way, 9800 series are rumours, and rumours on price are generally wrong. Alot are sayin it will sell for 800 AUD, which is total bs. They will hit shelves at easy 1grand with the teraflop chip. And the rumours on release dates are wrong too. Ppl saying novemeber, not true, the chips will be released next year after the ultras / gtx stop selling. And by then ill buy the 9800 (simlpy because it will be the best at the time) i will have the money and pass my gtx to my bro.
Bottom line, if ur cheap get the GTS but ur gona just need to upgrade in 1 year anyway. I always like the best. If u have the money to blow ur newest games including Crysis on 16x 16x at any res then get a GTX. Ive never heard a techy say a GTS is recommended and they know why, its marketed for people who cant afford the real product. Its like celeron was to the p4.
LOL,
get ur self crysis boom..... why is my GTS FPS lagg.... its happend over and over go check the Forums for crysis. And PSU problems mate, Im runnin 250W max of my 1000W psu. It dosent eat huge amounts its just a precaution to have huge PSU on GTX systems.
And its not an amazing difference yet because there as i said it will be the near future that GTX will blow GTS away in every aspect.
By the way, 9800 series are rumours, and rumours on price are generally wrong. Alot are sayin it will sell for 800 AUD, which is total bs. They will hit shelves at easy 1grand with the teraflop chip. And the rumours on release dates are wrong too. Ppl saying novemeber, not true, the chips will be released next year after the ultras / gtx stop selling. And by then ill buy the 9800 (simlpy because it will be the best at the time) i will have the money and pass my gtx to my bro.
Bottom line, if ur cheap get the GTS but ur gona just need to upgrade in 1 year anyway. I always like the best. If u have the money to blow ur newest games including Crysis on 16x 16x at any res then get a GTX. Ive never heard a techy say a GTS is recommended and they know why, its marketed for people who cant afford the real product. Its like celeron was to the p4.
I do run it at 1920x1200 but try doing that on crysis which is what i was reffering too.
LOL, GTS owned by 7900
http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/graphics/reviews/0611/pic/xl596_thumb.jpg
Dx 9 and 10 AA is not suitable for any GTS
imperialism
Registered User
if gts is better than gtx,why nvidia shud release gtx then..
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/980/11/page_11_benchmarks_company_of_heroes/index.html
Another review
Not just hi res - all res FPS is up to 100% better, and when AA is on it gets worse for the GTS...
sorry dude its facts, i did a lot of research on this before i bought it .... 2 techys told me to stay away from gts if u have the money
Another review
Not just hi res - all res FPS is up to 100% better, and when AA is on it gets worse for the GTS...
sorry dude its facts, i did a lot of research on this before i bought it .... 2 techys told me to stay away from gts if u have the money