MysteryMan
Registered User
Heres the two biggest issues I have with the rating system of players:
1. The "overall" rating of the player is actually his position rating, so lets say I make a player and make his primary position CF, then I give him weak CF stats and increase the stats that a CM needs alot.
That would make his "overall" rating lets say 74 while if you put him in a CM position his rating would be 92, that is very confusing and not needed.
Instead they should make an overall rating so if someone is a SS and CF and his ratings are 90 and 84 his overall rating would be around 87~.
2. The ratings are simply too high, I mean they can go way over 110 , whats that seriously?
The highest possible rating for ever position should be 100 period, what kind of rating is 110? lets just make ratings so the players will be 220 and 265 and 320 , seriously..
Imo the best player in the game atm Messi should have a rating of 90 maybe 92 max, and his max potential would be somewhere around 94/95 which should be legendary status.
1. The "overall" rating of the player is actually his position rating, so lets say I make a player and make his primary position CF, then I give him weak CF stats and increase the stats that a CM needs alot.
That would make his "overall" rating lets say 74 while if you put him in a CM position his rating would be 92, that is very confusing and not needed.
Instead they should make an overall rating so if someone is a SS and CF and his ratings are 90 and 84 his overall rating would be around 87~.
2. The ratings are simply too high, I mean they can go way over 110 , whats that seriously?
The highest possible rating for ever position should be 100 period, what kind of rating is 110? lets just make ratings so the players will be 220 and 265 and 320 , seriously..
Imo the best player in the game atm Messi should have a rating of 90 maybe 92 max, and his max potential would be somewhere around 94/95 which should be legendary status.