New Master League questions?
- Thread starter DAIR
- Start date
Stevie Baby
Village Idiot
You can have 2 player master league on PES4 anyway.
Stevie Baby
Village Idiot
I think it's a stupid idea.
Really, really stupid.
You and your mate would play each other only twice in the whole fooking season, maybe more depending on cups. And you'll have to sit through them changing formations, playing matches, blah blah until you're bored out of your tiny nads.
Daft idea, would never work.
Really, really stupid.
You and your mate would play each other only twice in the whole fooking season, maybe more depending on cups. And you'll have to sit through them changing formations, playing matches, blah blah until you're bored out of your tiny nads.
Daft idea, would never work.
Jake Small
Registered User
The winning eleven series should absolutely have a multiplayer master league, and I'd be severely disappointed if it didn't in the next iteration.
The ability to compete in a league with 5 or so others, compete for players, titles, etc, would be an awesome addition. Anyone who's ever played the madden franchise knows this works... my friends have year long seasons among the 6 or so of them each year in madden and NCAA football and it is extremely well done in those games.
The whole idea is attaching serious meaning to the player games: competing for season spots, titles, and watching eachothers' teams evolve.
As it stands now the master league would probably drag a little bit with more than one player, as I don't particularly enjoy my team until 2nd or 3rd seasons anyway, so perhaps a few changes could be made. Not sure. But the potential is definately there for a huge leap forward.
The ability to compete in a league with 5 or so others, compete for players, titles, etc, would be an awesome addition. Anyone who's ever played the madden franchise knows this works... my friends have year long seasons among the 6 or so of them each year in madden and NCAA football and it is extremely well done in those games.
The whole idea is attaching serious meaning to the player games: competing for season spots, titles, and watching eachothers' teams evolve.
As it stands now the master league would probably drag a little bit with more than one player, as I don't particularly enjoy my team until 2nd or 3rd seasons anyway, so perhaps a few changes could be made. Not sure. But the potential is definately there for a huge leap forward.
farfan-fan
Registered User
Shocked!
I must say that I am shocked..
First of all, if you only want ML to be one player you could choose to play it that way instead of having friends join in, so there's no problem with having the option of multiplayer at least.
Secondly, One of the great things about master league is exporting your team to use it in exhibitions against your friends, this way if you're competing for players you won't ever have the same players on each others teams.
Thirdly even if you would only play each other twice a season (assuming that you have only one friend of course, because if you have multiple friends you would have even more player games), it would actually make big games exciting, I'm not sure about the rest of you, but after a year or two of building your team don't you win almost every single game? So wouldn't it be better to institute more competition? What's the point of winning the league cup, the WEFA championships, and the season title every year when all that you did was beat computer teams?
I dont understand what people are opposed to? Other than improved game play this would be the best option to add.
I must say that I am shocked..
First of all, if you only want ML to be one player you could choose to play it that way instead of having friends join in, so there's no problem with having the option of multiplayer at least.
Secondly, One of the great things about master league is exporting your team to use it in exhibitions against your friends, this way if you're competing for players you won't ever have the same players on each others teams.
Thirdly even if you would only play each other twice a season (assuming that you have only one friend of course, because if you have multiple friends you would have even more player games), it would actually make big games exciting, I'm not sure about the rest of you, but after a year or two of building your team don't you win almost every single game? So wouldn't it be better to institute more competition? What's the point of winning the league cup, the WEFA championships, and the season title every year when all that you did was beat computer teams?
I dont understand what people are opposed to? Other than improved game play this would be the best option to add.
DJ BassBomber
Registered User
I say the more options the better.
Stevie Baby
Village Idiot
I think you're an arse, and your idea is stupid.