Could you try and be a bit more condescending please?
What I saw was that you were saying ML was too easy and you wanted it to be improved. From reading your posts it seemed like you started on a difficulty lower than Superstar i.e. not the hardest difficulty. You then said that you'd made a 4.5 star team out of the Fulham team before the first transfer window closed and that you were winning games far too easily by big scorelines and that you'd won the FA Cup and it was unrealistic.
My point was, and still is, that it seems odd to criticize the game for being too easy when you weren't playing it on the highest difficulty. By starting the season on professional I'm pretty sure that you'd get a much more generous transfer and salary budget than if you had started on superstar and then this must have contributed towards you being able to overhaul your team to 4.5 star so quickly.
I come on here to try and learn more about the game and share experiences. The reason I picked up on what you said was that in my experience, on superstar difficulty (which, at first, you said this had happened on), you did something that I thought would be barely possible. Also, I found that the grind through some tough early seasons on superstar made the game feel much more rewarding when you end up with a competitive side and can start to properly compete.
Personally I can't say I have seen any difference in the gameplay in Master League since the update. Sometimes I find that the way that the game plays feels different depending on the competition and the stage of the the season you're at.
I'll try to be a little bit more...
Kidding of course..
This response is fine, your other response was way too short sighted and presuming though. You don't tell someone to "get their story straight" without having some sort of real basis to support your claim.
I illustrated for you to see how it unfolded.
Again you have to take real life and time into account.
The game is a month old, I didn't know all the nuances, or balance, or mechanics. So obviously since I had some previous PES experience, I though professional would be a good place to start. I was smoking teams....so I bumped it up...played a few more, adjusted.
2 things, I thought it might be easier, because of "time" and "real life" to just bump the difficulty, rather than restart ML over every time I thought it was getting too easy.
However since the update has made it more competitive for me, I did restart a ML, and I'm something like 15wins, 3 draws, 0 losses right now. CPU has a difficult time scoring against me for some reason...
Though to address your 2nd paragraph. There's a difference between criticizing without reason, and coming on a forum, to discuss your experiences...so you could compare with other people playing the same game, and get their thoughts.
Then you run into small minded people like you sometimes, who say the most idiotic things. Because your point makes no sense.
I am not criticizing a game, because I think I'm so good, or that I'm misguided in trying to win, and fooling myself into thinking I'm winning at superstar because I really should of opened the game and put it on superstar out of the box, without even trying it.
You might not get this, but don't you think, the natural progression of things is, play for a bit, if it's too easy bump it up, try it out, see how it goes, bump it up or down depending on difficulty?
Furthermore, to be completely honest, I don't even recall the monetary difference at starting points...I do know, I ended up buying 2 of the same top players on both level just as cheap, plus an even better one on superstar...and I just signed two more, my team is actually probably better now then it was starting at a lower level....so your point is absolutely moot.
Both times, I bought Aymeric Laporte, and Alex Sandro....which was by chance, since the 2nd time, I got amazing deals on the them, under 20 mil. Also this time around I ended up geting Joao Mario, and with the leftover money I got Mohamed Salah for 16 mil, and CB Rudiger for 6.7 mil rated 79 I believe from Roma....
Here is the condescending part, though this time I'm not trying to be a prick. The shit that you say, makes you seem unintelligent, or lacking in character....I would say uninformed but that doesn't make sense, though it was nicer.
Usually when a person tries to make an arguement, you might want to have a sufficient factual data or evidence to support your theories...
You just assume a lot of dumb shit, without taking into account many other pertinent factors, like time, considering maybe a probably series of events based on real lilfe situations, though not factual in a non observers eyes, can make an educated thought process as how it could of been, maybe even would of been.
Even worse, you pass off your unfounded, opinions on others as though they had merit, when they were in fact, like I said unfounded, without rational thought behind them even.
See what I did, I gave my opinion, with facts, examples, supporting details....