drunkensailor
Registered User
robben, maduro, landzaat, van galen, mathijssen, kuyt, kromkamp all underrated, the dutch team has worse stats then ireland
hmy:
Lawn Care Service of Cedar Park 100 E Whitestone Blvd Ste 148, #166 Cedar Park, TX 78613 (512) 595-0884
Necrid said:Belachelijk inderdaad! Maar je kunt de stats makkelijk veranderen toch?
reece said:Of course you've got a chance in 2006,you have RUUD VAN NISTELROOY!!!
Why would you want to see a computer play a computer?LosGalacticos said:guys highly unlikely....i always love using the dutch-nat. i never pay attention to the stat but they're able to compete with brazil (and beat them often) when i let com play com.
Necrid said:Belachelijk inderdaad! Maar je kunt de stats makkelijk veranderen toch?
Edit: Did you see yesterday's match Holland-Germany, did you see Robben play? Holland owned! By the way I wont speak Dutch anymore...
Psimonius said:Whilst I'd agree that Holland are better then Ireland, Holland aren't rated highly because you haven't won anything (or come close) in decades. You do have the players tho and I think you've got a great chance in 2006.
I love playing as the Dutch and I'm from England! Always pick Holland over England every time. It suits my technical game better.
nah its a good mean to make money....by betting on the outcome....me n mates do it often its usually good funWhy would you want to see a computer play a computer?
Its bad enough watching your mates play in a tournament together!
LosGalacticos said:Van the Man is almost abck on his goalscoring ability(poaching)...who'll partner him for WC06?...i think it's a toss between Makaay and RVP....i'd much prefer the RVP, because he's more creative striker than Makaay
drunkensailor said:92 semi finals
94 quarter finals
96 quarter finals
98 semi finals
2000 semi finals
2004 semi finals, that is simply world class
compare to to for instance england who is overrated as hell in this game