WWE SmackDown! VS RAW 2008

[Dan]

Kelly Kelly will become the first victim of the "head squeeze of doom"



Say they do release downloadable wrestlers; how much do you think we'll be expected to pay? 100 Microsoft points is roughly 83 pence, which wouldn't be too bad.

 

[BarnDoor]

Nice to see Rick Rude make the game, but this pile of shit doesn't deserve a character like him.

 

[Scarface]

:laugh:

I hope so, I don't see any reason why they can't be.

I read an interview last month where a THQ guy said it's something they're "seriously considering". Raw on the Xbox even had that feature, so for it not to be included in SD vs RAW 08 would be pathetic.

Be prepared to be very surprised. THQ are lazy, I can't see them adding anyone else in the current roster. Hopefully you will be able to download them though (as I think that is a new feature).

They'll do it that way then, to prove they're also greedy. Won't be getting any of my money. Arseholes.

 

[nikos24]

Thought I'd give this a bump ¬_¬

For me, this cover has my attention and I'll buy the game. It should be able to generate lots of sales, I mean when was Taker last on the cover of a game??

 

[Haribo]

Never, but that's the American cover, and they always seem to get better ones than us in Europe. Daft really.

e.g. SvR 2007 America got:

We got:

I don't know whether we'll get the same this time round.

 

[nikos24]

I knew there was a Taker on a video game cover after a long thought.

Here it is, if you count it.

 

[BarnDoor]

You forgot an actual good game:

 

[Dan]

These look like PS2 graphics. :mellow: It looks like the scaffolding hot-spot returns. Always good for a larf.

 

[Neo]

For me, this cover has my attention and I'll buy the game. It should be able to generate lots of sales, I mean when was Taker last on the cover of a game??

I doubt that will be the release cover, they'll probably want an ECW superstar on there somewhere and I believe that cover was leaked before the draft (hence lashley).

 

[Joel]

What is with the blur? That better be PS2 graphics!

Unfortunately for CM Punk, I will be beating him with Elijah Burk - 4 UP Baby :smug:

 

[Haribo]

It looks blurred there.

But not here ¬_¬

 

[Killerkey]

Yeah i was going to say it must be the picture because even the font is all jagged and blurred...

 

[Joel]

Kind of high stats for a diva.

 

[Haribo]

MVP overall only 85. 5 less than Matt.

 

[Dan]

85 is quite low. Isn't Punk like 92 or something? MVP has been around longer, is on the better show and has won a title which actually matters. :| Although Punk might actually bring some quality to the ECW title now, before he won it, it was complete shit.

Belts still look like shit.

 

[Joel]

Thing is, MVP's strength, durability, technique and submission is higher than Matt's, while Matt has the better hardcore (probably because TLC matches), speed, stamina and charisma (don't agree with that).

But I think in the normal single match, MVP has the better stats, despite what the overall would tell you.

 

[Dan]

http://www.thq-games.com/uk/thqtv/index/994

Cool video, but the refs are pathetically slow and I still can't get my head around HHH being a power-house. :erm:


http://www.thq-games.com/uk/game/show/2187

Some class pix here.

 

[Haribo]

Love that one hmy:

 

[Joel]

Can't believe HHH is throwing Kane of him, like Kane it Hornswoggle. They need to sort those weight issues out.

Good to see you can throw someone off the top of the hell in a cell and through the table. No doubt, one of the challenges will be to throw Foley off the top using The Undertaker.

Those pictures look class. I haven't been watching entrances or much videos as I want to build up the hype for the game.

 

[Scarface]

I still can't get my head around HHH being a power-house. :erm:

That's ridiculous. He doesn't even outpower Kenny Dykstra like that, let alone Kane. They should have him as a brawler, or whatever Ric Flair is; technical?

Those images look great. Any news on how many wrestlers can appear in the ring for ladder matches, Royal Rumbles etc?